Header graphic for print
CAFA Law Blog Information, cases and insights regarding the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005

Category Archives: Case Summaries

Subscribe to Case Summaries RSS Feed

Only Concrete Evidence Can Keep a Defendant’s Case Afloat Under CAFA’S Legal Certainty Standard

Posted in Case Summaries, Jurisdictional Amount

Bell v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 2013 WL 1791920 (E.D.Cal. April 26, 2013). As amended by CAFA, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) vests district courts with original jurisdiction of any civil action in which the amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000, the aggregate number of proposed plaintiffs is 100 or greater, and any member of the plaintiff [...]

Read All ...

Forum Shopping May Not Qualify as Bad Faith

Posted in Case Summaries

Deaver v. BBVA Compass Consulting & Benefits, Inc., 2013 WL 2156280 (N.D. Cal. May 17, 2013). The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida determined whether the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Knowles, 133 S. Ct. 1345 (2013) rendered the District Court’s earlier decision in Lowdermilk v. U.S. [...]

Read All ...

District Court Can Stay Its Remand Order Pending Appeal

Posted in Case Summaries

Dalton v. Walgreen Co., 2013 WL 2367837 (E.D. Mo. May 29, 2013). Staying its remand order to facilitate the defendant to prefer an appeal, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri held that it had jurisdiction to reopen the case for the limited purpose of staying the remand order, because to hold [...]

Read All ...

Limited Liability Companies Are like Corporations for Purposes of Determining Citizenship under CAFA

Posted in Case Summaries

Heckemeyer v. NRT Missouri, LLC, 2013 WL 2250429 (E.D. Mo. May 22, 2013). The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri held that Congress chose to treat limited a limited liability company (“LLC”) like a corporation for purposes of determining citizenship under CAFA; thus, an LLC is deemed to be a citizen of [...]

Read All ...

Facts Outside of the Complaint and Notice of Removal Are Irrelevant for Deciding CAFA Jurisdiction

Posted in Case Summaries

Owens v. Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC, 2013 WL 2237740 (D. Kan. May 21, 2013). The U.S. District Court of Kansas has held that reference to factual allegations or evidence outside of the complaint and notice of removal is not permitted to determine the amount in controversy. The plaintiff brought an action in state [...]

Read All ...

Smith v. Honeywell International, Inc., 2013 WL 2181277 (D.N.J. May 20, 2013)

Posted in Case Summaries

Smith v. Honeywell International, Inc., 2013 WL 2181277 (D.N.J. May 20, 2013). The plaintiffs sued defendants, PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG”) and Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”), alleging that the chromium ore processing residue (“COPR”) used by the defendants to fill in residential and commercial areas in Jersey City exposed the class members to hazardous materials which [...]

Read All ...

The Supreme Court’s Knowles Ruling Is Not “Other Paper” Within the Meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1446(b)(3)

Posted in Case Summaries

Henry v. Michaels Stores, Inc., 2013 WL 2208070 (N.D. Ohio May 20, 2013). The District Court held that the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles, 133 S. Ct. 1345 (2013), is not an “other paper,” which could make a previously un-removable case removable under 28 U.S.C §1446(b)(3). The plaintiff alleged [...]

Read All ...

Is A Continuing Tort An “Event Or Occurence” Under CAFA’s Mass Action Provisions?

Posted in Case Summaries

Eleanor Abraham, et al v. St. Croix Renaissance, Group, L.L.L.P., 719 F.3d 270 (3d Cir. 2013). In this appeal, the Third Circuit held that CAFA’s phrase “an event or occurrence,” as it appears in the mass-action exclusion, is not limited to something that happened at a particular moment in time.  The plaintiffs, more than 500 [...]

Read All ...

Citizenship, not Residency bring cases to Federal Court

Posted in Case Summaries

Villa v. United Site Servs. of California, Inc., 2013 WL 2436605 (N.D. Cal. June 4, 2013).  District Judge Jon S. Tigar, writing for the Northern District of California remanded an action for failure to establish minimal diversity, holding that the relevant inquiry for determining whether minimal diversity exists is the citizenship of the parties, which [...]

Read All ...

Individual Claims are Immaterial because CAFA Aggregates the Class Claims

Posted in Case Summaries

Stella v. Hertz Corp, 2013 WL 2456042 (S.D. Cal. June 5, 2013). Establishing that the named plaintiff’s individual claims exceeds $75,000 is immaterial to CAFA jurisdiction.  What is important under CAFA is that the claim of the class should exceed $5 million.  Because the defendant here did not establish CAFA requirements, a District Court in [...]

Read All ...

Severance Under Rule 21 May Defeat CAFA Jurisdiction

Posted in Case Summaries

State of Louisiana v. American National Property And Casualty Company, 2013 WL 5201146 (E.D. La. Sept. 11, 2013). In this case, the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana held that, while subject matter jurisdiction is generally determined at the onset of litigation, when an action is severed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure [...]

Read All ...

Standard Fire v Knowles at Use in Practice in Arkansas

Posted in Case Summaries

Standard Fire at Use in Practice in Arkansas Deaton v. Frito-Lay N. America, Inc., 2013 WL 2455941 (W.D. Ark. June 5, 2013).  Relying on the recent Supreme Court’s decision in Standard Fire that “to defeat CAFA jurisdiction, a stipulation must be binding, and a plaintiff bringing a proposed class action cannot bind members of the [...]

Read All ...

Can A Complaint Be Mislabeled To Avoid CAFA?

Posted in Case Summaries

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Company, 722 F.3d 154 (3d Cir. 2013).   In this appeal, a majority of a Third Circuit panel held that an action brought by an insurance exchange – an entity, not a conglomerate of individuals – was not class action under CAFA. 

Read All ...

California Case! – only 25% of California Labor Code Penalties can be considered for Amount in Controversy Requirement

Posted in Case Summaries

Walker v Corepower Yoga LLC, 2013 WL 2338675 (S.D. Cal. May 28, 2013).  In absence of the Ninth Circuit precedent on the issue, a the District Court for the Southern District of  California, remanded an action to the state court and held that only 25 percent of the total potential California Labor Code Private Attorney [...]

Read All ...

Defendant’s Amount In Controversy Award Scrutinized for Time Barred and Other Inapplicable Damage Claims

Posted in Case Summaries, Uncategorized

Smith v. Lux Retail North America, Inc., 2013 WL 2932243 (N.D.Cal. June 13, 2013) In calculating damages, the defendant in this action had added damages that were outside the statute of limitations and otherwise inapplicable.  Rejecting the defendant’s calculations, a District Court in California remanded the action to state court.

Read All ...

Better Late Than Never: Defendant Allowed To Raise CAFA’s Home State Exception Three Years After Filing Complaint

Posted in Case Summaries

Gold v. New York Life Ins. Co., 730 F.3d 137 (2nd Cir. 2013). In this appeal, the Second Circuit held (1) that CAFA’s home state exception is not jurisdictional and must be raised within a reasonable time, and (2) that the district court’s discovery schedule, which required the defendant to complete individual discovery before commencing [...]

Read All ...

Defendant Lacked Energy To Maintain Jurisdiction Under CAFA

Posted in Case Summaries

Zuckman v. Monster Beverage Corp., No. 12-1978, 2013 WL 3992932 (D.D.C. Aug. 6, 2013). The District Court for the District of Columbia held that an action brought under the private attorney general provision of the District of Columbia’s Consumer Protection Procedures Act was not a removable class action under CAFA.

Read All ...

CAFA’s General Public Exception Does Not Apply To Action Brought By Mississippi’s Attorney General

Posted in Case Summaries

Hood v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., No. 12-00179, 2013 WL 3280267 (N.D. Miss. June 27, 2013). In this case, the District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi found that an action brought by Mississippi’s Attorney General on behalf of the State of Mississippi, as well as individual, Mississippi consumers, did not fall within the scope [...]

Read All ...

Seventh Circuit Refuses to Exalt Form Over Substance in Decision Reversing District Court’s Remand Order

Posted in Case Summaries

Addison Automatics, Inc. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co., 731 F.3d 740 (7th Cir. 2013). In this appeal, the Seventh Circuit found that the substance, not form, of a plaintiff’s complaint determined whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction under CAFA.  Also, the Seventh Circuit held that a class representative’s fiduciary duties extend to separate [...]

Read All ...

The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion – The Game Is On In Colorado

Posted in Case Summaries

Edwards v. Zenimax Media Inc., No. 12-00411, 2013 WL 5420933 (D. Colo. Sept. 27, 2013). In this case, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado held that once a case is properly removed under CAFA, the subsequent striking of class allegations does not divest a federal court of subject matter jurisdiction.

Read All ...

Fifth Circuit Grants Petition to Determine The Meaning Of “Significant Relief” Under CAFA

Posted in Case Summaries

Opelousas General Trust Authority v. Multiplan, Inc., 2013 WL 3245169 (5th Cir. June 28, 2013). Because it had yet to fully explore the meaning of “significant relief” in the context of CAFA’s local controversy exception, the Fifth Circuit granted the defendants’ petition for leave to appeal a remand order to consider the question. Defendant American [...]

Read All ...

California District Court Avoids Addressing Controlling Standard for Determining Amount in Controversy

Posted in Case Summaries

Ornelas v. Children’s Place Retail Stores, Inc., 2013 WL 2468388 (C.D.Cal. June 5, 2013). A District Court in California avoided addressing the effect of a recent Ninth Circuit decision on the controlling standard for determining the amount in controversy in a removed case where Plaintiff has pled less than the jurisdictional amount. The plaintiff, a [...]

Read All ...